
👋 Good morning! It’s Saturday 12 September 2026. I’m Neil McIntosh, editor of The Early Line, and it’s great to have you here.
📣 You’re reading the weekend edition of The Early Line. Paying subscribers get the full version, with six talking points and film, TV and sporting recommendations for the weekend.
They also have my huge thanks for making the whole newsletter possible, six days a week. If you’d like to join their ranks - thank you! - you can upgrade here.
And if that’s not for you, no problem: see you on Monday when the free Early Line is back at 7am.
Have a wonderful weekend, all!
🌦️ The weekend’s weather: A mixed bag - more overcast and with the risk of showers today for Glasgow, Edinburgh, Dundee, Aberdeen and Inverness, but tomorrow looks likely to be brighter, and more dry. London is the same, but in reverse - bright today, overcast and shower-y tomorrow. (Here’s the UK forecast).
SIX THINGS TO TALK ABOUT
Should we worry about AI killing us all? | The robots can’t make a hot dog, though | Red wine is not a cure-all | UK farming in decline | A life in Britain’s motorway services | Buying your apocalypse-proof home
🍸 How worried should we be about AI killing us all? It’s been the question of the week after AI researcher Jacob Coxon resigned from Anthropic, makers of Claude, and wrote a long thread on X explaining why.
The 27-year-old Briton urged us “not [to] underestimate the power of this technology. These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources. We have all witnessed the progress in each of these domains, and progress is not slowing.”
He warns: “the people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade”, but remain locked in a “space race” to continue to develop their technologies because - at least at Anthropic - “they believe no one else will act responsibly, so they must do it themselves.”
His X thread, and reaction to it, is well covered by this Wall Street Journal piece.
Should we take all this seriously? The short answer is: yes. Today’s FT (£) goes deep on the subject, and reports: “More than two dozen senior AI researchers, investors, academics and policy figures interviewed by the FT said that capabilities once considered distant are arriving faster than expected while the companies developing them remain locked in an increasingly bitter commercial race.
“‘There’s no question that competition between companies causes them to take shortcuts on safety,’ said Stuart Russell, a professor of AI at the University of California, Berkeley.”
Reed Albergotti, Semafor’s Tech Editor, offers a sober but more AI-positive view: We have nothing to fear but AI fear itself, he contends. There are dangers in panic.
Exactly how AI could get us all is something I’ll take a deeper dive on in The Early Line next week, at some point. It takes some explaining. I hope that’s not too gloomy a prospect…
Upgrade to read the full Party Line, including
Footage of a hot dog robot failing to make a hot dog will help you relax about our future overlords
But remember: red wine is not a cure-all
Warning alarm sounded on the UK’s farms
A life in Britain’s motorway services
An apocalypse-proof home? Let’s go!
PLUS: find top TV, film and sporting picks for the weekend.
Sound familiar?
Over 4 million people have had the same lightbulb moment.
Morning Brew is a free daily newsletter that breaks down what's happening in business, finance, and tech — clearly, quickly, and with enough personality to make it the best email in your inbox.
No yelling. No filler. Just the news, finally making sense.
Subscribe to The Early Line to read the rest
To enjoy the rest of today's Party Line, become a paying subscriber. You'll get web access to the rest of this post immediately, and the full edition emailed to you every Saturday from next week. Paid members also have full archive and commenting permission on The Early Line's website and, of course, my huge gratitude - because they sustain The Early Line for all.
Upgrade today
